The deadline exists. The evidence doesn't.
Your SOC 2 audit is weeks away.
Someone with leverage asks you to prove the business can operate through a disruption. An auditor on a fixed date. A regulator with a checklist. A customer's security review standing between you and the contract. A renewal that comes back the same time every year. The 80+ hours of build time does not care which one. Continuity Strength produces the evidence with you, AI-assisted and review-ready. Integrates with compliance platforms like Vanta or Drata.
When the deadline lands, the scramble starts. A SOC 2 auditor with a fixed window. A regulatory examination on the calendar. A customer's procurement team with a security review attached to a contract. A certification renewal that arrives the same week every year. Each one asks for the same operational evidence, and most teams do not have it organized, current, and ready to hand over.
The certification is recurring. The scramble does not have to be. Continuity Strength uses AI-assisted evidence creation to help you build, organize, and maintain the documentation behind every audit and customer request, the first time and every renewal after.
The resilience evidence behind every audit, certification, and review.
Audits don't fail because the work isn't there. They fail because the evidence isn't organized, current, or ready when the auditor, regulator, or customer asks. Continuity Strength closes that gap. It produces the continuity, incident response, testing, vendor oversight, and cyber risk assessment evidence reviewers expect, in the format they expect it, and keeps it current through every renewal cycle.
The deadline won't move. Cut the preparation time.
When the Deadline Lands
The DIY Problem
The Growth Blocker
The evidence they'll demand? Done before they ask.
Five evidence types land at the top of every review. Most teams have never produced one of them.
Three states. You're on one of them.
The Movers
Have the continuity, incident response, testing, vendor oversight, and cyber risk assessment evidence ready before the reviewer or customer asks. The audit cycle and the renewal cycle both complete without scramble.
The Majority
Build the evidence under deadline. Eighty-plus hours of build time come out of the roadmap. The audit date does not move. Renewals trigger the same scramble all over again the following year.
The Laggards
Fail the audit, lose the contract, or get a regulatory finding. The cost lands in three places: time, revenue, and trust.
Platform integrations keep your evidence in one place.
Continuity Strength completes the compliance platforms you already use to run your certification and security programs. It produces the continuity, incident response, testing, vendor management, and cyber risk assessment evidence those programs need.
Teams using a compliance platform like Vanta or Drata to manage SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other frameworks can use Continuity Strength to produce the evidence those frameworks expect. Continuity Strength completes your compliance stack rather than competing with it.
The eighty hour scramble, or evidence ready when they ask.
| Area | DIY Manual Creation | Continuity Strength |
|---|---|---|
| First-Time Build | No security background on the team, learning the requirements from scratch under a deadline | Structured workflow that produces the evidence without prior expertise |
| Evidence Organization | Scattered across shared drives, folders, and email threads | Centralized audit package in one place |
| Continuity & Incident Response | Generic templates adapted by hand over days, often incomplete | Review-ready continuity plans aligned to ISO 22301 and incident response plans aligned to NIST SP 800-61 |
| Tabletop Exercise Records | Ad hoc meeting notes no reviewer accepts | Centralized testing evidence with participants, decisions, lessons learned, and action items |
| Vendor Oversight | Vendor spreadsheets with no documented oversight trail | Documented vendor oversight records aligned to FFIEC-style expectations, in one place |
| Cyber Risk Assessment | Generic claims with no current scan or external verification | Cyber risk assessment with risk-tiered findings and recommendations across seven public-facing scan areas |
| Annual Renewals | Rebuild and reformat from scratch each year | Update and export for renewals in minutes |
| Compliance Integrations | No connection to existing compliance platforms | Produces evidence for compliance platforms like Vanta or Drata |
| Cost | 80+ hours of founder and employee time, or consultant fees | View pricing |
One resilience evidence set for every framework that asks.
Reviewers under SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, NIST CSF 2.0, GDPR Art. 32, DORA, SEC Reg S-P, NYDFS Part 500, FINRA Rule 4370, CMMC, HIPAA, FedRAMP, FFIEC, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, or other frameworks ask for variations of the same five evidence types: continuity, incident response, testing evidence, vendor oversight, and cyber risk assessment. The table below shows what each framework expects and what Continuity Strength produces against it.
| Framework | Typical Evidence Requested | What Continuity Strength Produces |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 (TSC) | CC7 system operations including incident response, CC9 risk mitigation including vendor management, A1 availability evidence | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| ISO 27001 | Annex A.5.29 ICT readiness for business continuity, A.5.30 ICT continuity, A.5.24 incident management planning, A.5.19-23 supplier relationships, risk assessment | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise documentation, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| ISO 22301 | Business impact analysis, continuity strategy and plan documentation, exercise and testing records, review and update evidence | Continuity plans with impact outputs, tabletop exercise records, review and update tracking, structured evidence export |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | Respond function including incident response, Recover function including communications and improvement, Govern including third-party risk | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| GDPR (Art. 32) | Ability to ensure ongoing availability and resilience, incident response procedures, recovery documentation | Continuity plans, impact outputs, recovery procedures, incident response plans |
| DORA (EU) | ICT business continuity policy, ICT response and recovery plans, testing program evidence, third-party ICT risk management | Continuity plans with impact outputs, incident response plans, tabletop exercise documentation, vendor oversight records |
| SEC Reg S-P | Rule 248.30(a) safeguards including incident response procedures, written response program, third-party service provider oversight | Incident response plans, continuity plans, vendor oversight records, written risk assessment |
| NYDFS Part 500 | 500.16 incident response plan, 500.11 third-party service provider security policy, 500.09 written risk assessment, 500.14 testing | Incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, written risk assessment, cyber risk assessment |
| FINRA Rule 4370 | Business continuity plan covering 10 enumerated elements including mission-critical systems, alternate communications, and third-party impacts | Continuity plans, recovery procedures, incident response plans, vendor oversight records |
| CMMC | Evidence that incident response, contingency planning, vendor oversight, and risk assessment controls operate in practice | Incident response plans, continuity plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| HIPAA Security Rule | Contingency plan (164.308(a)(7)), data backup, disaster recovery, emergency mode, testing and revision | Continuity plans with impact outputs, recovery procedures, tabletop exercise records |
| FedRAMP | Contingency plan, incident response plan, contingency testing evidence, risk assessment | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, cyber risk assessment |
| FFIEC | Business continuity management, incident response, third-party risk management, examination-ready documentation | Continuity plans, incident response plans, vendor oversight records, tabletop exercise records |
| ISO 42001 | Annex A.6.2 AI system lifecycle including operation and monitoring, A.6.2.8 event logs and AI incident management, Annex A.10 third-party AI supplier oversight, Clause 8.4 operational planning for AI, testing and review evidence | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| NIST AI RMF | Govern function policies and accountability for AI risk, Map function AI system context and third-party components, Manage function incident response and continuity for AI-supported operations, Measure function ongoing performance evaluation | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
| EU AI Act | Article 9 risk management system for high-risk AI, Article 17 quality management system, Article 73 serious incident reporting, Article 25 obligations along the AI value chain, Article 15 cybersecurity of high-risk AI systems | Continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight records, cyber risk assessment |
Built simple so you don't need a security background.
SaaS & Tech-Enabled Teams Pursuing SOC 2
Founder-led SaaS teams, MSPs, and IT service providers pursuing SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other certifications to win and keep enterprise customers, whether it is the first audit or the annual renewal.
Newly Funded Companies Facing Security Reviews
Teams that just closed a round and are now hitting enterprise procurement and security questionnaires for the first time, often with no compliance program in place.
Registered Firms Under Reg S-P, NYDFS & FINRA
Investment advisers, broker-dealers, and registered firms facing the SEC Reg S-P smaller-entity deadline, NYDFS Part 500 certification, FINRA Rule 4370 examinations, or other regulatory windows where documented incident response and oversight evidence is expected on a fixed date.
Vendors Onboarding With Enterprise Customers
Small and mid-sized vendors that need audit-ready continuity, incident response, and vendor oversight records to clear an enterprise procurement review and keep the contract.
You are facing a compliance deadline, you do not have a security background on the team, and rebuilding the evidence from scratch every year is not an option.
Everything you want to know.
What is Continuity Strength?
Continuity Strength is a compliance evidence solution that uses AI-assisted documentation to help teams produce audit-ready continuity plans, incident response plans, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight documentation, and cyber risk assessment for audits, certifications, regulatory examinations, and enterprise customer reviews.
What does it help you produce?
Business continuity plans, incident response plans, business impact analysis outputs, tabletop exercise records, vendor oversight documentation, cyber risk assessment with recommendations, and audit-ready summaries.
What does the cyber risk assessment include?
Continuity Strength's cyber risk assessment scans your organization's public-facing digital assets across seven areas: email security, vulnerabilities, website configuration, exposed services, secure headers, leaked credentials, and marketplace mentions. The output is a risk-tiered report with recommendations, included in every package.
I have never done this before. Is it built for that?
Yes. Continuity Strength is built for teams facing a compliance deadline for the first time, with no security or compliance background in-house. The solution structures the work so you produce review-ready evidence without prior expertise.
Which platforms does it integrate with?
Continuity Strength produces the continuity, incident response, testing, vendor management, and cyber risk assessment evidence your compliance platform needs, whether you run Vanta, Drata, or another, for SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other frameworks.
Does it help with Reg S-P or NYDFS deadlines?
Continuity Strength produces incident response, continuity, and vendor oversight evidence commonly expected under SEC Reg S-P (Rule 248.30 incident response), NYDFS Part 500 (sections 500.16, 500.11, and 500.09), FINRA Rule 4370, and other frameworks. It does not provide legal advice on filing obligations.
What happens after the first audit? Will it hold up at renewal?
Yes. Continuity Strength is built for the renewal cycle, not just first-time certification. Evidence is updated through structured refresh cycles so the documentation a reviewer sees at year two reflects current state, not the snapshot from year one.
Where do I see pricing?
See pricing on the Compliance Evidence pricing page. Enterprise networks can request a quote via Contact.
Be the team that's ready, before the request ever lands.
The same documents your auditor, your regulator, or your biggest customer asks for. Ready the first time, ready every renewal. Integrated with the compliance platforms you already run.
We reply within one business day.